 |
|
- Della
M. Hughes, Susan P. Curnan
In March 1993 the Guide Team of the National Network for Youth conceptualized
the term "Community Youth Development" (CYD) to define a new philosophical,
sociological, and educational movement which harnesses the power of youth
to affect community development and, similarly, engages communities to
embrace their role in the development of youth. Since that time, the National
Network has worked to define CYD's core elements and to chart a course
capable of mobilizing the emerging field from a vision to a blueprint
for action. This article describes CYD and the development of its framework
or "logic model": how it emerged, its purpose and principles, the process
of formalizing its methodologies and strategies, and its outcomes and
impact.
The dawning of the millennium captures our attention. A millennium, as
opposed to a decade or even a century, is a remarkable unit of time. It
is less comprehensible because humans have no living, first-hand memories
over that span; we are aware only of what has been recorded in writing
and art, and the remains of bones, artifacts, living spaces, and geological
formations. Further, with the rapid rate of change we have experienced
in the past 50 years, it is difficult to comprehend what may lie ahead
50 years from now, much less in 1000. We are more cognizant now than ever
in history of the impact of human beings on the planet and the potential
we have for creation and destruction. With this as a backdrop, the millennium
marks the chance for a new beginning, or perhaps even more importantly,
a chance to pause and learn from our past in order to move ahead in a
way that benefits us all.
For those of us with a passion for justice, equality, and inclusiveness
that emanates from every individual, family, neighborhood, town, city,
state, and country--those who are committed to the development of young
people and communities--this chance for reflection, focus, and action
renews our hope. It is not necessary to be held hostage to the iniquities
of our past and present: we have the capability to change. Our task becomes
a clear articulation of our vision and principles, and the strategies
and activities needed to achieve them. The result of part of this work--the
development of an articulated framework for Community Youth Development--is
presented in the pages that follow.
The Roots of Community Youth Development
Community Youth Development (CYD) is an affirming, yet deeply challenging
approach. A cursory view of CYD raises questions and ignites both passion
and fears. Most youth and community activists who have seen the framework
feel a deep connection to its content and intent. It has moved many who
have devoted two or more decades to this endeavor to feel the spark of
their passion for the work rekindled. But many questions emerge: Is it
just another way to talk about traditional youth or community development?
Are the young people and families so often forgotten in communities once
again being left out? Who developed CYD? How do I fit into the picture?
What does CYD concretely mean for me, my organization, and community?
Does CYD proscribe what I have to do? The answers to some of these questions
may be addressed through an exploration of its roots.
CYD did not just emerge suddenly, full-blown, from the heads and hearts
of a small group of people. Activists and youth workers in neighborhoods
and communities, pioneers in youth development and school reform, radicals
in the primary prevention movement--all were contributing to a climate
that was ripe for the development of a holistic approach to youth and
community. CYD's seeds were also evident in the key principles that have
guided the direction and work of the National Network since 1975. These
principles included a belief that young people have strengths, regardless
of their life situations; that they should have basic rights in our society,
including the right to make decisions about their lives; and that they
belong in families and communities rather than institutions. The seeds,
too, could be found in the very best of youth
and community work throughout history and that which is taking place every
day in communities across the country. Additionally, it was built upon
the knowledge, experience, and perspective of people who see across boundaries,
whether they be geographic, cultural, academic, practice, or policy.
Through the process of conceptualizing and developing CYD, we have learned
that it expands on the definitions of youth development and community
development to create a new and larger context for youth in community.
CYD assumes the involvement of young people in their own development and
that of the community--in partnership with adults--to make use of their
talents and increase their investment in community life. CYD is about
young people actively involved in the process of developing their own
identity, self worth, independence, and sense of belonging, as well as
their connection to family, community, the earth, and the sacred. Key
principles of CYD include creating a culture of respect and partnership,
creating a just and compassionate society, creating safe space, creating
a culture of appreciation, transferring practical, usable skills, being
conscious stewards of relationships, and finding and living one's true
calling.
CYD
assumes the involvement of young people in their own development and that
of the community--in partnership with adults--to make use of their talents
and increase their investment in community life.
Voices and stories of the
young people and adult partners in the National Network speak loud and
clear about the power and potential of CYD--in creating communities that
are just and compassionate, where young people are valued and engaged
in full and healthy development.
Despite this potential National Network members (primarily community-based,
youth-focused organizations) must manage in a time of complex change that
requires continuous improvement in both quality and accountability.
A burgeoning youth involvement and participation movement, the increasingly
complex set of risks and opportunities facing today's young people, and
an increased focus on measuring program outcomes and impacts by government,
the United Way, and foundation funders have accelerated the need for organizational
development processes.
The CYD Framework (see pages 12 - 13) was developed in April 1999 as a
result of this need. The Framework was cocreated by the National Network
for Youth CYD Guide Team, staff, and members working closely with our
partners at the Institute for Sustainable Development, Heller Graduate
School, Brandeis University. Susan Curnan and Lisa LaCava facilitated
an inclusive and clarifying process that helped us take this important
step. Also called a "logic model," the Framework provides a picture of
how CYD works: the way it links outcomes with program strategies as well
as its undergirding theoretical assumptions and principles. The clarity
of thinking that occurs from the process of building and refining the
framework has become an important part of the overall success of the CYD
movement.
A Social Analysis of Community Youth Development
Community youth development is a simple but profound approach. Its
simplicity is rooted in very basic values and assumptions that have far-reaching
implications. The implications create complexity because CYD is essentially
a paradigm shift. The CYD approach holds an appreciative, holistic, relational
worldview, rooted in justice and compassion. This serves as the basis
for all action, as Gandhi said, "to be the change we want to see in the
world." But the truth is that we live in a society that believes and behaves
differently.
In order to change lives you have to work on the whole. As a society,
however, we have been working on young people rather than with
them. We have been ignoring broader community and societal issues and
leaving young people out of important dialogue. And when we do address
community issues, young people are seldom involved as partners in community
creation, maintenance, and change. Youth are often viewed as persons who
are "not fully developed"; who are "going through a stage" that will "thankfully"
end sometime in their twenties. Recently, with the increase in publicity
about youth-related violence, teenagers are also seen as dangerous and
frightening beings. Young people are bearing the brunt of our fear and
unwillingness to collectively create a society that values and welcomes
their participation.
In
order to change lives you have to work on the whole. As a society, however,
we have been working on young people rather than with them.
In general, we have not created
healthy environments where people can thrive and flourish. In particular,
our youth-serving system tends to be based on a deficit-driven model that
is not equipped to create space for healthy development and relationships.
This system can be partially characterized by the following:
- Inconsistent and fragmented
services delivered by inadequately prepared youth and community workers.
- Programs that are non-community
focused and further increase disconnectedness, dependence, and fragmentation.
- Vague values and philosophy
of practice which results in an idiosyncratic approach.
- Youth and community
workers who are over-specialized and over-protective.
- Practice that is externally
driven.
- Professional groups that
compete for turf.
- Political motivations
that direct funding of youth and community work rather than need.
- History and learning that
get muddled.
In the end, what began as an effort to create better social, psychological,
environmental, and physical health for all young people has evolved into
a "diagnosed problem" model of treatment, which fails to look at the whole
person in the context of families and communities. Youth are seen as a
collection of problems instead of future parents, neighbors, and workers
who need maximum adult involvement, teaching, and encouragement to grow
and be productive citizens. What began as an effort to have just, safe,
and economically viable communities has evolved primarily into the creation
of affordable housing and jobs for adults. In this system, neighborhood
development was viewed in economic terms rather than more comprehensively.
Despite these discouraging conditions, there are still creative, dedicated,
inventive people doing youth and community work. CYD focuses on
how we can harness this energy, creativity, and dedication of both youth
and adults to create systems and communities that fully engage
young people in their own development and in building sustainable community.
The Need for a CYD Framework
Still, over the past seven years, communication about CYD has been
limited and uneven. To start with, while elements of the approach were
evident in many different settings (service learning, community schools,
empowerment and enterprise zones, and street outreach come to mind), there
was no one unifying model to build upon. In addition, a picture of the
whole was held only by a few, many of whom were simultaneously learning
and being called upon to articulate the approach to others. This often
resulted in ideas that were neither fully formed nor set in a context
that facilitated full participation. Last, the transformation of CYD principles
into action has been spotty, for principles alone don't sufficiently convey
what people need to know to fully grasp the approach.
The CYD Framework was created to address these challenges--particularly
to set CYD forth in a clear and straightforward manner. The model itself
is not only a tool for education, but for engaging others in co-creation
of the strategies and activities necessary to advance CYD.
The Framework that follows*is a working draft, and will always will be
as such because of the evolutionary nature of our goals. If our collective
work is successful, we will hone the principles (assumptions) and outcomes,
and use them as our compass for developing and implementing strategies
and activities. Theoretically, the strategies--and especially the activities--should
be more flexible, to enable customization of particular locales and situations.
Regardless, those who learn to use the tool will have a template for their
own work: the focus can readily be adapted for many types of organizations.
For example, the National Network customized its own CYD framework to
address its specific part of the CYD effort by adding "youth who face
greater odds because of abuse, neglect, family conflicts, and disconnection
from family, lack of resources, community prejudice, differing abilities
and other life challenges, and community-based organizations working with
youth, families, and communities" (see the"For Whom" section in the chart).
Table
1
Building a Framework for CYD
|
|
|
Sidebar
1
Getting Ready for Outcome Evaluation:
Developing a Logic Model

|
Della M. Hughes
is the Executive Director of the National Network for Youth, an advocacy
and membership organization with over 700 direct members. She is a
noted public speaker and writer and serves on the board of the National
Assembly of National Voluntary Health and Welfare Organizations, and the
advisory committee of the California Wellness Foundation Children and Youth
Community Health Initiative. She contributed to the design and leadership
of the Emerging Leaders roundtables at the 1997 State of the World Forum.
In 1998 she and two young people represented the United States at the third
World Youth Forum and the first Minister's Responsible for Youth Meeting
in Portugal. She also participated in the 1999 Family Re-Union, Family
and Community, hosted by Vice President and Mrs. Gore, and is a member
of the International Learning Group sponsored by the Ford and International
Youth Foundations.
Susan P. Curnan, Associate Professor and Director
of the Center for Human Resources at
Brandeis University, is also cochair of the MM and MBA program concentration
in Children, Youth and Families and cofounder of the new Brandeis Institute
on Sustainable Development. Her research and practice is focused on improving
the quality of life for children, youth, and families with specific attention
to youth transitions and the role of work, education, family, and environmental
influences in healthy development. As Director of one of the nation's leading
research and policy organizations in the broad area of youth development
and community life, Susan has written extensively on youth policy, quality
performance models, and innovative methods for documenting organizational
and community change. Susan is a graduate of Yale University with advanced
degrees in management and environmental science and science education.
|
 |