 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Volume
2, No. 3
Summer 2001
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
CBO
Schools:
Reinventing High School Education
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Richard
Murphy, Stephanie M. Smith, Jean
Thomases, Center for Youth Development
CBO
schools provide one of the best, long-standing examples of schools
that have used Community Youth Development principles and practices
to help young people of all backgrounds to learn, grow, and succeed.
This issue's cover story, written by staff at the Center for Youth
Development and Policy Research as well as two CBO school professionals,
examines the ways in which CBO schools support quality education.
Quality
education and high standards for all students. It is a rallying
cry of both hope and concern that is being echoed all over the country.
Many students, parents, educators, and youth development experts
know what kind of high schools all young people need in order to
succeed in a democratic society and the rapidly changing job marketplace.
The schools they describe provide learning experiences that engage
young people and challenge them to use knowledge. They are learning
communities where each young person is known, respected, and supported;
where their potential is nurtured; and where they are safe and able
to build vital, positive relationships with adults and peers.
Yet, a large segment of our nation's high school students do not
have access to the schools that adequately provide these critical
elements of quality education and healthy youth development. Building
schools and communities that provide quality education and high
standards for all high school students requires that we search within
our mainstream educational systems and in our broader educational
communities for schools that are successfully working with the young
people who might otherwise be left behind.
CBO schools, public schools that are operated by community-based
organizations, are able to re-engage these young people in education
and help them to succeed due to several crucial assets:
- Commitment
to working effectively and intensively with young people who are
most in need without trying to "fix" them
- Access
to the community resources and services that support student learning
and provide for diverse educational experiences in school and
in the broader community
- Familiarity
with the community's young people and families, and experience
working with them on personal as well as community issues
- Opportunities
for young people to contribute to their communities
In an effort to bring the lessons of CBO schools to the current
movement to reinvent high schools and bring high standards and achievement
to all young people, the Center for Youth Development and Policy
Research (the Center) at the Academy for Educational Development
(AED) undertook an examination of 11 CBO schools across the country.
In its forthcoming report, CBO Schools: Changing Lives and Transforming
High Schools, the Center presents profiles on each of these
schools and a cross-case analysis focusing on the five common areas
of principles and practices that help these schools to re-engage
young people. Specifically:
- High
and comprehensive standards
- Relevant,
diverse learning opportunities
- Personalized,
flexible learning environments
- Supports
and services for effective learning
- Opportunities
to make a contribution
Each of these five areas involves principles and practices that
come together at the crossroads of quality education, community
development, and youth development. CBO schools re-engage young
people in their own education, development, and communities by giving
them opportunities to become active participants, valuable resources,
and capable leaders. Students at CBO schools have a range of formal
and informal opportunities to contribute their ideas, skills, talents,
and energy in order to shape their own learning environments and
their communities. The diverse and relevant learning experiences
integrate many of these opportunities into curriculum. The close,
positive relationships at CBO schools make it more likely that students
will take advantage of opportunities outside the curriculum. CBO
schools maintain high and comprehensive expectations of what young
people can contribute to their own education, school, and community
as well as what they can achieve academically.
CBO
schools re-engage young people in their own education, development,
and communities by giving them opportunities to become active participants,
valuable resources, and capable leaders.
The opportunity to be a productive, contributing member of their
schools and communities can be a transformational experience for the
many students attending CBO schools who have previously felt powerless
and disconnected from active participation in learning, school life,
and the community. Each of the 11 CBO schools that the Center has
worked with has an important story to tell regarding the power of
this experience in helping their students to succeed and to improve
their communities.
In this article we offer a glimpse of the ways that two CBO schools,
El Puente Academy for Peace and Justice in Brooklyn and TransCenter
for Youth, Inc.'s Shalom High School in Milwaukee, integrate quality
education, community development, and youth development. |
|
 |
| |
|
El
Puente Academy for Peace and Justice:
Bridging Youth, Education, and Community
By
Beth Lev Wehner
Today, Williamsburg, Brooklyn, is a neighborhood of contradictions.
From the days when Betty Smith immortalized it in A Tree Grows
in Brooklyn through the twentieth century, it was a community
of new immigrants. Williamsburg has traditionally been a place where
foreign languages were as common as English and its inhabitants
worked long hours for low wages. Now, the make-up is changing. For
most of the '80s and '90s, Williamsburg, and especially its south
side, was dominated by Hasidic Jews of the Satmar sect and Latinos,
mostly Puerto Rican and Dominican. While the two groups are largely
segregated despite their close proximity, they have several things
in common. Both are working-class communities with a tendency toward
large families; therefore, they need to make small paychecks stretch
to feed, clothe, and shelter large numbers of people living in close
quarters. In the past five years the neighborhood has changed; bodegas
have turned into boutiques, vacant lots into trendy nightspots,
and factories into converted lofts. With its easy access to Manhattan,
abundance of abandoned industrial buildings, and sweeping views
of the city, Williamsburg has become irresistible to young, mostly
white artists who want to escape Manhattan rents. The problem is,
predictably, that with the new, wealthier interest in Williamsburg,
the neighborhood has become unaffordable to families who have lived
there for years.
Williamsburg is also home to El Puente Academy for Peace and Justice,
a public high school that is housed within a CBO. The CBO, El Puente,
means "bridge" in Spanish. It is aptly named, for it not
only serves as a bridge to young people between self and community,
but between childhood and adulthood as well. The goal of the Academy
is not just to educate young people but to help them see their relationship
with and responsibility to the community that raised them. When
El Puente first opened its doors 20 years ago, it was largely a
response by people who had grown up in the south side to the youth-on-youth
violence that plagued Williamsburg. El Puente did its job, perhaps
too well: violence is down in the south side, but rents are up.
And despite El Puente's commitment to the neighborhood, more than
half of its students come from nearby Bushwick, Bedford-Stuyvesant,
and other neighborhoods where the rent is more affordable. Out of
fear of further displacement, gentrification and development have
become two of El Puente's biggest human rights priorities. The CBO
and the Academy have partnered to learn as much as possible and
then organize around these issues.
El
Puente Academy for Peace and Justice[is] a public high school that
is housed within a CBO. The CBO, El Puente, means "bridge"
in Spanish. It is aptly named, for it not only serves as a bridge
to young people between self and community, but between childhood
and adulthood as well.
As a math teacher and senior advisor, I have, in cooperation with
CBO staff, other teachers, and the students themselves, designed three
graduation portfolio projects that seek to serve as learning opportunities
for the seniors and provide necessary research to El Puente's community
organizers. The students not only practice the math skills they have
gained over three and a half years at the Academy, but they see the
purpose of those skills. Perhaps even more importantly, they have
the chance to give something to their community and learn more about
human rights.
Three years ago, the senior class undertook the first of these portfolio
projects. The project focused on the Community Reinvestment Act, a
law designed to protect against redlining and ensure that banks gave
loans to the people who live in the communities that they service.
The graduating class researched local banks' records and wrote a report
on who was getting loans and who wasn't. They then handed this report
to the community organizers in the CBO, who have been using it to
direct their strategic planning. As a part of the second portfolio
project, last year's graduating class researched the impact that rents
have on different communities. They looked at rent as a percentage
of income for people of different races and classes to better understand
how changing rents affect people.
Both of these portfolio projects focused on the problems related to
gentrification. They were about what other people are doing to this
community, rather than what this community can do about these problems.
This year, we decided to focus the portfolio project on development.
The project is now in progress. We picked six abandoned properties,
some in Williamsburg-and because Williamsburg has largely been gentrified
and thus too expensive-some in Bushwick, a nearby neighborhood that
is very susceptible to gentrification. The properties include an old
mansion, a deserted power plant, a vacant lot under the Brooklyn Queens
Expressway, and an unused parochial school. In groups of two to three,
the students will write a report including recommendations for development
of one of these sites. The report will include four sections:
- A
scale drawing of the site. Since the sites are unavailable
to the public, this required some imagination and ingenuity. The
students used surveyors' techniques to find the dimensions of
the buildings in order to draw models of the sites.
- A
development budget for the site. This development budget will
be based on the estimated market values of the sites prepared
for tax records and contractors' formulae for estimating the cost
of development. Students will both compute these numbers and explain
how the formulae work and why they are useful.
- A
financial plan for acquiring and developing the site. Students
will study interest rates and bank loans. Based on what they have
learned and the development budget, they will determine the actual
cost of developing the building. How much money would a potential
buyer need to have up front? How much would they have to pay every
year? How would a grant from the government or a private investor
impact the money a buyer would need?
- A
proposal for how the site should be developed. The seniors
will read the Community Needs Assessment written by the Community
Board and use it to form a recommendation for how the site should
be developed.
As with previous senior portfolio projects, these reports will be
used by El Puente for community organizing purposes. The students
will learn math while they are learning to research, organize, and
use information on how to buy property. These skills are all a valuable
part of their education. Equally important, they will have the experience
of helping their community by identifying a problem and then working
proactively to be part of a solution. In years to come, they may
see some of these buildings developed according to the plans that
they designed. It is a part of their education that they will never
forget, and possibly even a part that will change, in some way,
the course of their lives.
Currently a math teacher at El Puente Academy, Beth Lev Wehner
has also taught English and history. She is advisor to the Student
Council and the Wilderness Club. Raised in Boston, she now lives
in Bushwick, Brooklyn.
|
|
| |
|
Education
and Community:
Rediscovering the Connections at Shalom High School
By
Daniel Grego, Ph.D.
The words education and community have become
what linguist Uwe Poerksen calls "plastic words": words
that are "rarely used in a particular, precise, appropriate
manner." Education is commonly conflated with "school
attendance." In everyday conversation, education is often referred
to as a thing to which every child is entitled. As a metaphor,
community must be one of the most overused words in the English
language. I realize, therefore, that in writing about education
and community, I risk being misunderstood. So, I better begin by
defining terms.
Education is the process by which people become responsibly
mature members of their communities. And a community? A human community
is a group of people who live together, work together, and practice
together the arts of living and learning in a particular place.
The frequently invoked African proverb "It takes a village
to raise a healthy child" speaks to the importance of communities
for quality education. You will notice, however, the proverb does
not say, "It takes a village to create a system to raise
a healthy child."
This is where I think we took a wrong turn. Somehow, we convinced
ourselves that the division of labor used to manufacture pins or
widgets most efficiently could be applied to education. So, in our
approach to schooling, we tried to create what historian David Tyack
called The One Best System and inserted it between our communities
(the villages) and education (the raising of our children). But
children are not pins or widgets. Systems cannot substitute for
communities. When learning is separated from the life of a community,
education becomes impossible.
The myth that must be debunked, therefore, is that schools educate
children. They do not. Communities do. Schools are only tools that
communities can use as part of the educational process. The responsibility
for education belongs to the entire "village."
In Milwaukee, as in other large urban areas across the country,
about half the students who start ninth grade drop out before graduation.
Shalom High School was founded in 1973 to work with those young
people who were not succeeding in the traditional high schools.
The first task in designing an effective educational environment
for these students is to create within the school at least a semblance
of community. The size of the school is an important consideration
in trying to do this. In his book The Tipping Point,
Malcolm Gladwell cites the work of British anthropologist Robin
Dunbar, who has concluded, "The figure of 150 seems to represent
the maximum number of individuals with whom we can have a genuinely
social relationship." Adolescents want to go to a place "where
everybody knows their name," where each student is recognized
as an individual and where each student's special gift is appreciated.
Ted Sizer and others have argued that to teach students well, one
must know them well. If Dunbar is right, this cannot happen in a
school whose total population is more than 150.
In addition to keeping the school small, it is important to ensure
that students feel ownership and responsibility for the community
within it. This can only happen if they have some real power. At
Shalom, the school rules were written initially by the students
themselves, and the school handbook, in which the rules are recorded,
can be amended by the students. If there is a serious violation
of the rules, the offender must appear before a discipline committee
on which students are called to serve in a manner similar to jury
duty.
In our society, adolescents are caught in a limbo between childhood
and adulthood at a stage in their development when they desperately
want to be acknowledged as adults. At Shalom, we have found that
it is much better to treat students as adults and risk being disappointed
from time to time by someone who is immature than to treat adolescents
as children and alienate them all. Shalom reinforces the ideas of
responsibility and interdependence during a weeklong orientation,
"Building the Shalom Community," in which all students
and staff participate. The week is designed to help students understand
what it means to be a part of the community, what their responsibilities
are, and what they can contribute. During the week students and
staff build relationships in activities such as gardening, conducting
neighborhood clean-ups, and cooking lunch for the whole school.
At
Shalom, we have found that it is much better to treat students as
adults and risk being disappointed from time to time by someone
who is immature than to treat adolescents as children and alienate
them all.
The second task in designing an effective school is to embed it
in the life of the surrounding community. Adults must be asked to
exercise their responsibility in the educational process and interact
with students. The students, in order to move toward responsible maturity,
must become actively and positively engaged in the community around
them.
At Shalom, adults from all sectors of the wider community serve on
an advisory committee that reviews the school's program and makes
recommendations for improvements, evaluates student progress, mentors
students, certifies their graduation, and advocates for students once
they graduate. Perhaps the most dynamic interaction between students
and the advisory committee occurs during each student's Defense of
Graduation, or DOG. Before graduating, students must assemble portfolios
of their best work and present them to a group of people from the
greater community who assess their readiness to graduate. A DOG can
take several hours. Students and community members alike have experienced
them as powerful rites of passage. If a high school student's defense
is successful, a new adult is welcomed by elders into the community.
Shalom students are active in their community in a variety of ways.
In just the last couple of years, the Shalom students have participated
in the following activities:
- Working
with the elderly at an adult care center at a neighborhood church
- Collecting
and donating food and clothing for the homeless and poor
- Organizing
a neighborhood clean-up
- Planting
gardens
- Joining
neighbors in opposing the request for a liquor license by a local
store by testifying before the Milwaukee Common Council
- Participating
in a neighborhood anti-tobacco campaign
- Tutoring
younger students at a middle school
- Visiting
a prison on a regular basis and mentoring incarcerated girls
- Assisting
the NAACP in a 2000 get-out-the-vote effort
- Meeting
with the Milwaukee School Board to advocate increasing the number
of charter schools and other small schools
- Implementing
the Center for Democracy and Citizenship's Public Achievement
program in Milwaukee
Are the
Shalom students better educated because of the involvement of community
elders in the school? Just ask them. More of them go on to college
than ever before. More of them find productive work. More of them
are active citizens.
Is Milwaukee a better community as a result of the efforts of the
Shalom students? Just ask the hungry they helped feed, or the sick
or incarcerated they visited, or the children they tutored and mentored.
As a model, Shalom is far from perfect. However, in its small way,
it is rescuing education and community from the junk pile of plastic
words-and giving them some flesh and blood, some human energy and
commitment. It's a start.
Daniel Grego has been working with
at-risk students in Milwaukee since 1980, first as a teacher, then
for 12 years as the director of Shalom High School. Since 1993,
he has been the director of educational services at TransCenter
for Youth, Inc., the nonprofit community agency that governs the
Northwest Opportunities Vocational Academy (NOVA), El Puente High
School for Science, Math and Technology, and the CITIES Project,
in addition to Shalom High School.
|
|
Conclusion
The examples
of El Puente, Shalom, and other CBO schools illustrate some of the
ways that the critical relationships among young people, their schools,
and their communities can support quality education. The integration
of community development, youth development, and formal learning helps
to re-engage young people in education because they are able to apply
what they are learning through positive contributions to the quality
of life in their communities. When schools operate as true communities,
and when they build strong connections to the broader communities
in which their students live, young people find relevance in their
learning and seek to become active, contributing members in their
schools and communities.
When
schools operate as true communities, and when they build strong
connections to the broader communities in which their students live,
young people find relevance in their learning.
These examples have value for educators and CBOs working with
young people of all ages and backgrounds, as well as for policymakers
working toward the goals of quality education and high standards for
all at a systemic level. CBO schools and other alternative community-based
educators are resources with particular value for effecting reforms
in the public high school system that will help the young people most
often left behind to reach for these goals. Teachers, principals,
and superintendents can look to CBO schools for strategies and practices,
which help those students often unsuccessful in large public high
schools to learn and achieve at high levels. CBO leaders and staff
members who may contemplate establishing a school can learn from existing
CBO schools what it takes for a CBO to provide high-quality formal
education. Policymakers and funders can strive to increase knowledge
of and support for CBO schools and other community-based alternative
schools that play such a crucial and undervalued role in the public
education system.
Authors
Richard
Murphy is director of AED's Center for Youth
Development and Policy Research. Stephanie M. Smith,
program officer at the Center, and Jean Thomases,
senior consultant to the Center, are authors of the Center's report
CBO Schools: Changing Lives and Transforming High Schools.
(back to top)
To obtain the report CBO Schools: Changing Lives and Transforming
High School or to find out more about community-based schools,
you can contact the Center at (202) 884-8267 or email them at cydmail@aed.org.
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |